Skip to content
Guide8 min read

Client Email Review for Agencies: One Version, One Link, One Decision

Agencies drown when every client feedback thread references a different draft. Freeze versions, share review links, record approve or request-changes.

By The Memo Team

Last updated

Quick answer

Run agency client review on an immutable version with a single share link, preflight clearing mechanical issues first, and a recorded approve-or-request-changes outcome - separate workspaces and Brand Kits per client so feedback never crosses brands.

Agency review breaks when the client comments on Tuesday’s PDF while you edited Wednesday’s canvas. The fix is boring: one frozen version, one link, one decision per round.

Separate clients at the workspace layer

Each client gets their own workspace, Brand Kit, and template library. Never blend assets or approval history across orgs.

Preflight before the client sees it

Clients should not be your QA department for broken links. Run preflight before sharing a review link.

End each round with a decision

Approve or request changes - logged on the version. Next round starts from a new snapshot, not silent edits to the old one.

Example (fictional): Apple (sample brand) (agency) shares one review link per client round. Clients stopped asking “which PDF is this?” because the version number is visible.

Frequently asked questions

Can clients edit the email directly?
Workflow-dependent - often clients comment or approve while the agency edits. The point is a clear decision on a frozen version.
How many review rounds are normal?
Two or three structured rounds beat endless Slack. Each round gets a new version.
Does Memo replace client reporting?
No. Memo replaces ambiguous draft handoffs. Campaign reporting stays in your ESP.
Can I export to the client’s ESP?
Yes - approved HTML exports to the sender they use. Memo does not send campaigns.